nomaddesk.blogg.se

Textwrangler text editor mac
Textwrangler text editor mac













  1. #Textwrangler text editor mac how to
  2. #Textwrangler text editor mac mac os x
  3. #Textwrangler text editor mac mac os
  4. #Textwrangler text editor mac code
  5. #Textwrangler text editor mac license

Things like the file window look totally out of proportion and just plain wrong.

#Textwrangler text editor mac mac os

The Mac OS version of the interface is just horrible. It does syntax highlighting, tag completion, split screens whatever way you want. I like it, but at some point I got fed up with the lack of speed, and the memory consumption. Here's the thing: I've used JEdit probably more than all the other editors combined.

#Textwrangler text editor mac mac os x

I used the Mac OS X distribution of JEdit from the main JEdit web site. But if I can't trust it, none of that matters. It looks good, has a great font, once you get the hang of the documents drawer and drag-n-drop placement of files in it, you can be really productive. It didn't work - it screwed up by overwriting some stuff, and I can't trust it any more. This was my great chance to get much of the features of BBEdit for none of the price. I got this from The Barebones Textwrangler page. Only with one file in view, only one split I didn't realise because the menu option was greyed out. Next editor, please! Ok, so CTRL-Y is paste from current clipboard. Here's a killer: no integration with native OS X clipboard. It handles large text files easily (eg 70k+ lines), where programs like subethaedit think for ages. Memory consumption is low, and it's fast. I guess I could live with this editor if I invested the time in using it. Unixy CTRL-A for start-of-line and CTRL-E for end-of line work fine, but Apple-S for save doesn't. That's not so bad - the window furniture is fairly minimal, so no great overhead.ĭownside #3: Keyboard shortcuts are cumbersome. I can probably achieve vertical splits by opening new windows. Split screen works well, but only horizontal splits AFAICT.

#Textwrangler text editor mac how to

The only available font sucks, which means I probably need to dig through the fine manual to find out how to add more, or make it support OS X native fonts if possible. At least the OS X version has some icons, looks presentable out of the box, and is reasonably usable straight away.Īnother plus is that it's obviously capable of XML/SGML validation etc., I can see it checking tags when I open/close them.ĭownside #1: fonts. I used an Emacs derivative years ago on the Amiga, which is why I have split-screen addiction. I used Emacs for OS X 10.3 Panther build.įirst impressions of Emacs is that it isn't too horrific. There's some unfortunate display corruption going on though - I don't think the default font is too happy. We can split windows, and memory consumption is low. No Apple-S saving here though, and we have the mode-driven GUI: 'i' to insert, escape, then :w to write. So, out of the box it has a nice small font, decent syntax hightlighting and integration with OS X for opening files. It lacks all the advantages of a modern GUI interface. That's exactly the problem though: it's useful to know but only as a fall-back. most useful of tools, it can be depended on to be on any unix-like machine anywhere, a handy fall-back if all else fails. Probably because it does nothing fancy or useful. Interesting to note that it only uses 6.7mb with the two test files loaded. It's nice and friendly but not built for full-time editing. Yeah, you're right, I'm not seriously proposing to use nano for anything more than very casual quick edits. If I mark a particular criteria as '?' it means the product was so tediously unfriendly I never investigated it I'm sure some editor sycophant will let me know. Memory consumption was guestimated using OS X's Activity Monitor, looking at the value for "Real Memory" usage. The test was simple - try editing this very page in each of the editors. There's a reason I'm on this platform, after all.

  • mac support: it should be fully-integrated with the mac.
  • I spend most of the time on the command-line anyhow.
  • source control integration: nice, but not required.
  • An editor that is reasonable in its requirements is a must.
  • small footprint: with cocoon, jetty, tomcat, firefox, and mail, there's not much room left.
  • Building from within the editor is preferable, but not required.

    textwrangler text editor mac

    XML support is a must: preferably tag completion and well-formed checks.

    #Textwrangler text editor mac code

    language support: i want syntax highlighting, folding, code completion optional.I want to be able to split the screen at least horizontally, preferably vertically too. visually useful: maximise the edit area, reduce menus, icons etc.sensible price: I'm thinking £50 is the sweet-spot, but I'd stretch to maybe £70.

    #Textwrangler text editor mac license

    license: an open source license is preferable for all the obvious reasons.

    textwrangler text editor mac textwrangler text editor mac

    Of the various editors out there, as I search for a new one. I'm fussy when it comes to editors, I can never seem Editors on Mac OS X Editors on Mac OS X Introduction















    Textwrangler text editor mac